Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Nissan Note 2013

 
Suzuki Swift
2013 - 2017
Nissan Note
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 94 HP90 HP
Torque: 118 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds11.9 seconds
Nissan Note is a more dynamic driving.
Suzuki Swift engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan Note, but torque is 82 NM less than Nissan Note. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.03.6
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Suzuki Swift consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 210 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres41 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway1280 km on highway
Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.85 m4.10 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.51 m1.53 m
Suzuki Swift is 25 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 211 litres325 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
528 litresno data
Nissan Note has more luggage space.
Suzuki Swift has 114 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Note.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`510
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 76005800
Pros and Cons:
    Nissan Note has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv