Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Nissan Note 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 14 HP more power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Nissan Note. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 25 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
528 litres | 1495 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 114 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 967 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Note has
| |