Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Mazda 2 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 19 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 17 NM less than Mazda 2. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
528 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 69 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 422 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |