Suzuki Swift 2023 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 13 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.8 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A90 is a 1.3-liter aluminum four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, used mainly in compact Mitsubishi models. It is a simple and lightweight unit designed with fuel economy in mind, but over time several characteristic weaknesses tend ... More about Mitsubishi Colt 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1032 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`460 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |