Suzuki Swift 2023 vs Volkswagen Golf 2024
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 333 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.6 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 251 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 312 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 8.5 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 660 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Swift is 44 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 341 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1197 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 2.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`040 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |