Suzuki Swift 2023 vs Skoda Fabia 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 2 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Fabia can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Fabia version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Swift is 28 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1190 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.8 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |