Suzuki Swift 2023 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 28 HP less power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Skoda Fabia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Swift is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`620 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |