Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 22 HP more power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen Up!. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Up! can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Up! version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger, but slightly lower. Suzuki Swift is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 9 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
579 litres | 959 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Up! (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`380 kg | 1`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 940 kg | 1`002 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 440 kg | 358 kg | |
| Suzuki Swift load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Volkswagen Up!. Therefore, Suzuki Swift is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Up! is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Up! scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Up! has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |