Suzuki Swift 2020 vs Kia Picanto 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 45 HP more power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Kia Picanto. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.5 | |
|
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Picanto gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Kia Picanto can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Kia Picanto version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Kia Picanto 2017 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia Picanto 2017 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 30 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 14 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
579 litres | 1010 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`445 kg | 1`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`025 kg | 939 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 420 kg | 461 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests, but Kia Picanto is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |