Suzuki Swift 2018 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 65 HP more power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Volkswagen Up!. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Up! is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Up! gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Up! can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Up! version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Suzuki Swift 2018 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Swift 2018 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger, but slightly lower. Suzuki Swift is 29 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 959 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`445 kg | 1`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 990 kg | 940 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 455 kg | 390 kg | |
| Suzuki Swift load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Volkswagen Up!. Therefore, Suzuki Swift is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Up! is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Up! scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Up! has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |