Suzuki Swift 2018 vs Toyota Aygo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 71 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Toyota Aygo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.2 | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki Swift engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 44 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 12 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 168 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Aygo scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |