Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 19 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
| By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 2 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda 2 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | 787 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 39 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 2 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 2 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |