Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Kia RIO 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 9 HP more power than Kia RIO, but torque is 3 NM less than Kia RIO. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia RIO 2011 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia RIO 2011 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Swift is 20 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | no data | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 77 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia RIO scores higher in safety tests. The Kia RIO scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Kia RIO has
| |