Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Kia Picanto 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Kia Picanto is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 9 HP more power than Kia Picanto, but torque is 2 NM less than Kia Picanto. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Kia Picanto 2011 1.2 engine: Most owners speak positively about this engine. It has a simple and reliable design with no major engineering flaws. The main downsides are noticeable noise, vibrations, and modest power output. With proper ... More about Kia Picanto 2011 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 26 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 10 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | 605 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 11 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`330 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Picanto scores higher in safety tests. The Kia Picanto scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Picanto has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |