Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift 2013 and Suzuki Swift 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift 2013 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2015, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift 2013 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2015. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Suzuki Swift 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift 2013 and Suzuki Swift 2015 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
512 litres | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`480 kg | 1`520 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`115 kg | 1`060 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 365 kg | 460 kg | |
| Suzuki Swift 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Suzuki Swift 2015. Therefore, Suzuki Swift 2015 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |