Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2015

 
Suzuki Swift
2013 - 2017
Suzuki Swift
2015 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP136 HP
Torque: 160 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 secondsn/a seconds
Suzuki Swift 2013 and Suzuki Swift 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km7.1 l/100km
By specification Suzuki Swift 2013 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2015, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift 2013 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2015.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
570 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)130 mm (5.1 inches)
Suzuki Swift 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality. High engine timing chain lifetime. Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur.

Dimensions

Length: 3.89 m3.89 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.51 m1.51 m
Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift 2013 and Suzuki Swift 2015 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 211 litres210 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
512 litres900 litres
Suzuki Swift 2013 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift 2015. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Swift 2015 (by 388 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`520
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10 8005200
Pros and Cons:
    Suzuki Swift has
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv