Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Nissan Micra 2013

 
Suzuki Swift
2013 - 2017
Nissan Micra
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP80 HP
Torque: 160 NM110 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds13.7 seconds
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive.
Suzuki Swift engine produces 56 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.45.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km6.1 l/100km
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 210 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres41 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway950 km on highway
570 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.89 m3.78 m
Width: 1.70 m1.67 m
Height: 1.51 m1.52 m
Suzuki Swift is larger, but slightly lower.
Suzuki Swift is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 211 litres265 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
512 litresno data
Nissan Micra has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Suzuki Swift has 54 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. This could mean that the Suzuki Swift uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.3 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`425
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

low
Suzuki Swift has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 8007000
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Swift has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Nissan Micra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv