Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Toyota Yaris 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 36 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 3.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 36 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Suzuki Swift 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 286 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 75 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |