Suzuki Swift 2015 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift 2015 and Suzuki Swift 2013 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift 2015 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift 2015 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift 2015 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2013. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Suzuki Swift 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift 2015 and Suzuki Swift 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
900 litres | 512 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`520 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`060 kg | 1`115 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 460 kg | 365 kg | |
| Suzuki Swift 2015 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Suzuki Swift 2013. Therefore, Suzuki Swift 2015 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
| |