Suzuki Swift 2015 vs Nissan Note 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 46 HP more power than Nissan Note, but torque is 40 NM less than Nissan Note. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 3.6 | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Note gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
900 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 115 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Note has
| |