Suzuki Swift 2015 vs Suzuki Swift 2013

 
Suzuki Swift
2015 - 2017
Suzuki Swift
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP136 HP
Torque: 160 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.7 seconds
Suzuki Swift 2015 and Suzuki Swift 2013 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.16.4
Suzuki Swift 2015 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2013, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift 2015 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 42 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)130 mm (5.1 inches)
Suzuki Swift 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality. High engine timing chain lifetime. Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur.

Dimensions

Length: 3.89 m3.89 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.51 m1.51 m
Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift 2015 and Suzuki Swift 2013 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres211 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
900 litres512 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight: 1`520 kg1`480 kg
Net weight:1`075 kg1`115 kg
Load capacity:445 kg365 kg
Suzuki Swift 2015 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Suzuki Swift 2013. Therefore, Suzuki Swift 2015 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 520010 800
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Swift has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv