Suzuki Swift 2015 vs Kia RIO 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 13 HP more power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Kia RIO. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.4 | |
| Suzuki Swift consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki Swift 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Kia RIO 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Swift is 23 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
900 litres | no data | |
|
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 78 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia RIO. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia RIO has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Kia RIO has
| |