Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift 2004 engine produces 24 HP less power than Suzuki Swift 2010, but torque is 52 NM more than Suzuki Swift 2010. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift 2004 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2010, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift 2004 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift 2004 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Wagon R+ | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki Swift 2004 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift 2004 is smaller. Suzuki Swift 2004 is 16 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift 2004 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | 204 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Swift 2004 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift 2010. The Suzuki Swift 2010 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift 2004 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift 2010. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |