Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller. Suzuki Swift is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | 400 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 7 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Swift (by 162 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |