Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | Used also on Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Swift is 49 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |