Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift 2004 engine produces 2 HP less power than Suzuki Swift 2010, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Suzuki Swift 2010. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift 2004 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift 2004 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift 2004 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift 2004 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift 2004 is smaller. Suzuki Swift 2004 is 16 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift 2004 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | 204 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Swift 2004 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift 2010. The Suzuki Swift 2010 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift 2004 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift 2010. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |