Suzuki Swift 2004 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 9 HP more power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 3 NM less than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 15 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 1 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 213 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 167 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 761 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |