Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Honda Jazz 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Honda Jazz. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Swift can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Suzuki Swift version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Vitara, Suzuki SX4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Suzuki Swift engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki Swift 2017 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Swift 2017 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.89 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 16 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 266 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1314 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 88 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |