Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Hyundai i10 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 3 HP more power than Hyundai i10, but torque is 3 NM less than Hyundai i10. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i10 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai i10 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 18 cm longer than the Hyundai i10, 8 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 252 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
579 litres | 1046 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 13 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i10. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i10 (by 467 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`405 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |