Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Nissan Micra 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift and Nissan Micra have the same engine power, but Suzuki Swift torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Micra. Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Captur, Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Swift is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1004 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 35 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.7 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Micra scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Micra scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |