Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Skoda Fabia 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 16 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 65 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | 1`541 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |