Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift and Volkswagen Up! have the same engine power, but Suzuki Swift torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Up!. Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger, but slightly lower. Suzuki Swift is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | no data | |
| Suzuki Swift has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | 1`360 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Up! is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Up! scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Up! has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |