Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Up! is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift and Volkswagen Up! have the same engine power, but Suzuki Swift torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Up!. Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Up! can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Up! version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger, but slightly lower. Suzuki Swift is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
947 litres | 959 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 14 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Up! (by 12 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`365 kg | 1`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 840 kg | 1`002 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 358 kg | |
| Suzuki Swift load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem more than Volkswagen Up!. Therefore, Suzuki Swift is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Up! is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Up! scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Up! has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |