Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Toyota Yaris 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 9 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Despite less power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2014 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Yaris 2014 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, 4 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 286 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 21 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Yaris scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Yaris scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |