Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Nissan Micra 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Used also on Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger, but slightly lower. Suzuki Swift is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | 1`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |