Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger, but slightly lower. Suzuki Swift is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 7 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
947 litres | 912 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Swift has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Swift (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`365 kg | 1`340 kg | |
| Net weight: | 840 kg | 845 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 495 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |