Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Mini Cooper 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 46 HP less power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mini Cooper. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 2 cm longer than the Mini Cooper, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Swift has 54 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mini Cooper scores higher in safety tests. The Mini Cooper scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |