Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Mini Cooper S 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 102 HP less power than Mini Cooper S, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Mini Cooper S. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mini Cooper S engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.41 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 1 cm shorter than the Mini Cooper S, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Swift has 54 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper S. The Mini Cooper S may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper S, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mini Cooper S has
| |