Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Mini Cooper S 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 102 HP less power than Mini Cooper S, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Mini Cooper S. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.7 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Cooper S can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mini Cooper S version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.41 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 1 cm shorter than the Mini Cooper S, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
947 litres | 731 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mini Cooper S may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Swift (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper S, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`365 kg | 1`635 kg | |
| Net weight: | 840 kg | 1`220 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 415 kg | |
| Suzuki Swift load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Mini Cooper S. Therefore, Suzuki Swift is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mini Cooper S has
| |