Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Ford KA 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Ford KA. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.1 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Swift consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 10 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | no data | |
| Suzuki Swift has 5 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`365 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Ford KA has
| |