Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Audi A1 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Suzuki Swift) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Audi A1) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Audi A1 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift and Audi A1 have the same engine power, but Suzuki Swift torque is 110 NM less than Audi A1. Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 3.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 37 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.84 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Swift is 13 cm shorter than the Audi A1, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
947 litres | 920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1 metres less than that of the Audi A1, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`365 kg | 1`640 kg | |
| Net weight: | 840 kg | 1`195 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 445 kg | |
| Suzuki Swift load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Audi A1. Therefore, Suzuki Swift is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi A1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Audi A1, so Audi A1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Audi A1 has
| |