Suzuki Swift 2023 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Swift is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Colt can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 100 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 - 4.5 | 5.5 - 6.2 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1032 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 1`457 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |