Suzuki Swift 2020 vs Toyota Aygo 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Swift is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Aygo can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.4 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 - 129 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 235 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 13.8 seconds | 13.8 - 15.2 seconds | |
| In general, Suzuki Swift are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Aygo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 5.6 | 4.2 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 39 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 12 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 168 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
947 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Swift has 97 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`401 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |