Suzuki Swift 2017 vs Toyota Aygo 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Swift is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Aygo can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 140 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 235 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 12.6 seconds | 14.3 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 6.1 | 3.8 - 4.2 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 40 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 12 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 266 litres | 168 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
947 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Swift has 98 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`396 | ~ 1`240 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Aygo scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Aygo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |