Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Seat Ibiza 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
Suzuki Swift is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Seat Ibiza has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 1.2 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 94 HP | 60 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 118 NM | 108 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 8 - 16.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.85 m | 4.23 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
Suzuki Swift is 38 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 430 litres | |
Seat Ibiza has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 226 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`645 | |
Safety: | |||
Suzuki Swift is better rated in child safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |