Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Mazda 2 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.3 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 75 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 119 - 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.4 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 - 5.8 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 46 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`457 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Suzuki Swift scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |