Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suzuki Swift is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda Jazz has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.2 - 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 90 - 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 114 - 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.3 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 5 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 224 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |