Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Toyota Yaris 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 136 HP | 69 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 93 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 11.7 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.4 | 3.9 - 5.2 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 286 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 75 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`486 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Yaris scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota Yaris scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |