Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Nissan Note 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 136 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 110 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 11.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.4 | 3.6 - 5.1 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 24 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | 1495 litres | |
|
Nissan Note has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 114 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 983 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`510 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Note scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Note scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Note has
| |