Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Nissan Micra 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 136 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.4 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki Swift has 54 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. This could mean that the Suzuki Swift uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |