Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Kia RIO 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia RIO is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 94 - 136 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 121 - 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.4 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.86 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
Suzuki Swift is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Swift is 18 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 288 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | no data | |
Kia RIO has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 77 litres less trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`624 | |
Safety: | |||
Kia RIO scores higher in safety tests. The Kia RIO scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Kia RIO has
| |