Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Kia Picanto 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 136 HP | 69 - 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 160 NM | 94 - 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 13.5 seconds | 11.4 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 6.4 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Suzuki Swift petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.86 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 27 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 10 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | 605 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 11 litres more trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Picanto, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`480 | ~ 1`335 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Picanto scores higher in safety tests. The Kia Picanto scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |